Hi!
Aravind Naidu wrote:
> Is that a violation of the spec ?
That's a matter of definition I guess. We are not in violation, but any
client writer would be ;-)
> I vaguely recall that the PRO.narrow is compulsory and for those that do not
> implement IIOP, it is a noop.
Yeah, perhaps we should include the javax.rmi classes. They're available
by default in JDK 1.3 though.
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.jboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
