Hi!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's not mandated by ejb 1.1 but is for 2.0 so we'll have to do it eventually.
> I'm not sure what Rickard has in mind. When last he and I spoke of this, he
> and I agreed this task was going to be deferred a bit. It was originally my
> interested when I first got involved w/jboss...
Supporting RMI-IIOP is a part of Project Game Over (see jBoss homepage).
My opinions were related to how Telkel is going to use jBoss, and for
our purposes RMI-IIOP is irrelevant and just a bad solution for how to
do distribution of EJB's.
Many others have voiced an interest in this, so this *will* be done.
Just not by me, that's all.
regards,
Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.jboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
