> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Beauregard
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 10:49 AM
> To: jBoss MailList
> Subject: [jBoss-User] re questions
>
>
> Yeah I am interested in these questions as well,
>
> dann
>
> travas jensen wrote --> "
> I've been looking over the website and I can't quite seem to get a clear
> picture of what the current status of things is.
>
> What does jBoss support?

EJB 1.1, JMS, JSP+Servlet with Tomcat integrated

> Is there a list of jBoss features somewhere?

There isn't a list but I think the most proeminent are

Dynamic "hot" deploy,
configurable contaiener
small footpring
JMX support
"full" J2EE implementation/integration

> Are there any archetecture documents for jBoss?

you haven't looked really hard have you ?
it is in howto jboss architecture

> What pieces of the J2EE spec are currently implemented (ie: can be run
> in a production environment)?

Ok implemented all of the above,  jboss2.0 was released mid-may and is being
stabilized, give it a couple of week.

> Are any pieces not ready to be run in a production environment?
> If I am looking for a J2EE 1.1+ compliant server, is jBoss the answer
> today?

You can develop on jboss, most people do to evaluate the technology with a
state of the art container.

> If not, is it the answer in 3-4 months?

Yes, project Game Over's goal is to reach j2ee stability ASAP.  Will take
the time it takes.  Do read up on pGO.


> Is there a list of live sites using jBoss right now?
>
> Well, that is all I can think of right now. :)  I'm sure more will
> surface later.  Thanks for you time. "

regards
marc

>
>
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to