Ingo Bruell wrote:
> is it allowed to create an Interface that is extendes from the
> RemoteInterface and implemented from the Bean class? In the case before I
> have used it. In my other beans I use it too and it works.
>
> This errors are shown:
> ---- snip ----
> [Container factory] remove in bean has not been mapped
> [Container factory] remove in bean has not been mapped
> [Container factory] getEJBMetaData in bean has not been mapped
> [Container factory] getHomeHandle in bean has not been mapped
> [Container factory] create in bean has not been mapped
> [Container factory] getEJBHome in bean has not been mapped
> [Container factory] getHandle in bean has not been mapped
> [Container factory] getPrimaryKey in bean has not been mapped
> [Container factory] isIdentical in bean has not been mapped
> [Container factory] getComponents in bean has not been mapped
> [Container factory] addComponent in bean has not been mapped
> [Container factory] removeComponent in bean has not been mapped
> [Container factory] getNewComponents in bean has not been mapped
<snip>
This is really really weird. I don't understand this.. it's a stateful
session bean, right?
/R
--
Rickard �berg
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.jboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
