> Your design is real rickard, it is a success and the integration
> proves it.
Oh and in case I haven't said it yet,
I truly believe your design is better
If only you would let us help you make it work...
you would be amazed, ease of use and all, wow!...
kind regards
marc
>
> I am also slighly amused, when you factor the EJB work so much
> and away from
> the container you end up having to do all the EJB work at the last
> interceptor and that gave us the wonderful "JAWS does EJB calls"
> silliness... SO I was looking at the interceptors and going "my... he has
> REALLY achieved the nirvana of factorization and design HIS CLASSES DO
> NOTHING AT ALL !!!!!!!!! :))))))" and the poor jaws at the end of the "we
> pass along but we do nothing" interceptors had to take care of deep EJB
> calls. :))) ooops.
>
> I am juuuuuuuust kidding.:)))))
>
> Seriously now. I believe we still have a serious problem with
> performance.
> I need to double check that and make sure those numbers are real.
> But 10ms
> for Stateless beans is not really good, in fact it is pretty bad... My
> "low-tech" 2 classes impl, ran fast at least :). Again not to worry, that
> we will tackle in time (soon) I think we have already done a lot of
> progress.
>
> PLgC
> marc
>
> >
> > > Actually I am pulling your leg, you don't do it *that* bad, ok
> > you did in
> > > the EJX metadata stuff but that is ok (remember the
> > > getContext().getContext().getContext().getContext
> > (/outofbreath)? stuff???)
> >
> > I will reiterate that the getContext() stuff was simply a terribly minor
> > implementation detail. You wanna bring that up again?
> >
> > > but really that is ok and I AGREE with you that the extensions in the
> > > container are good and useful.
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > > Let's not get in religious arguments over "I like my
> > hierarchies with 2 or 3
> > > depths, but no more".
> >
> > Well, you know how I react when you do the "design sucks" thing. I turn
> > reddish. :-/
> >
> > > I really believe that factorization is a "late stage" excercise. Good
> > > design (like the one you did) doesn't go overboard with
> > abstract classes and
> > > "implements pedantable, unreliable, unreadable" classes.
> >
> > True. I just pointed it out since MessageBeans is around the corner and
> > the property factorization will be pretty apparent.
> >
> > /Rickard
> >
> > --
> > Rickard �berg
> >
> > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.telkel.com
> > http://www.jboss.org
> > http://www.dreambean.com
> >
> >
> > --
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
