Hi!
marc fleury wrote:
> > So, my point is that we *should* comply with the latest version of J2EE
> > and allow stand-alone application clients to use the java: namespace. In
> > order to do that there should be some changes to how we do things
> > though. For example, I would suggest that our use of the global naming
> > JNDI namespace changes so that the deployer *cannot* choose arbitrary
> > JNDI-names *per bean* but instead only chooses a JNDI-root to which all
> > beans are bound. E.g. "myapp" so that the bean "MyBean" would end up in
> > "myapp/MyBean" in global JNDI. This means that the java: implementation
> > for stand-alone clients become VERY simple since all we have to do is
> > bind the name "java:comp/env" to the LinkRef "myapp". If I then lookup
> > "java:comp/env/MyBean" in the client this would automatically resolve to
> > "myapp/MyBean". Tada. Done.
>
> how do you know that java:comp/env/
> 1- for client 1 points to myapp1
> 2- for client 2 points to myapp2
>
> ?
Through the application client deployment information (which we don't
have yet). This is something we would have to develop, but with the
above scheme it would be fairly simple.
> for beans that is trivial we are indirected by the container but for client
> *there needs to be a call somewhere* saying this is my app. What is this
> call? please explain.
As above. Like jboss.xml but for application clients.
> > If we keep the current way of doing things where each bean can be given
> > a JNDI-name this becomes much more work for the deployer since he would
> > have to resolve ALL bean references manually.
>
> I am not sure I understand what you propose, if what you propose is that the
> deployer not be given the liberty to choose jndi names but just the root of
> the name (and then what? the ejb-ref name? please explain) we would have to
> think some more about it.
A full global JNDI-name would be "<app-name>/<ejb-name>" (e.g.
"mycompany/myapp/MyBean"). app-name is jBoss specific and given in
deployment information, whereas ejb-name is given in standard
ejb-jar.xml.
> Now, before you go ape-shit,
That's a new one I have never heard before.. funny.. :-)
Makes sense now?
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.jboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
