On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Rickard Oberg wrote:
> Yes, through reflection. I'm just saying that IF you want interfaces to be
> loaded dynamically these are the conditions that must be met.
>
> And using reflection is not painful at all if you use a Java scripting
> language based on reflection, or if you introspect the beans and provide a
> GUI to invoke the methods (just like the EJBench EJX plugin does).
Well, sure, anything's easy if you're using the right tools. But
I suspect most EJB clients won't be doing that.
Okay, so if (for a non-reflection situation) the dynamic class
downloading can't get around the need for having the interfaces on hand,
what does it get you? I guess you can avoid distributing the JTA JAR, but
the client still needs the jnp-client.jar and ejb.jar, right? How about
jboss-client.jar? It seems like it makes things a little better, but
you've still got to distribute some JARs.
Now with reflection, I guess you only need jnp-client.jar. Is
that right? Sure, I could try it myself, but it sounds like you know
already... :)
Aaron
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
