On Sep 29, Ole Husgaard quoth:
> When I try to use java.lang.Integer for a primary
> key in a BMP entity bean, the verifier complains:
>
> [Verifier] EntityExc: The primary key class must be a legal Value Type in RMI-IIOP.
>
> But Integer looks to me like a legal RMI-IIOP value
> type.
> When looking at the verifier code, it looks like this
> message comes because Integer does not have a no-argument
> constructor, but I don't think this is required.
>
> So the question is:
> Is this a bug in the verifier, or a bug in my perception?
>From what I can see, java.lang.Integer is a perfectly valid RMI-IIOP type.
Is the actual bean attribute an int or an Integer?
C=)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are no significant bugs in our released software that any significant
number of users want fixed. -Bill Gates, Focus Magazine, Oct 23, 1995
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Caskey <caskey*technocage.com> /// TechnoCage Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Welcome to the slippery slope, here is your handbasket.
...say, can you work 70 hours this week?"
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
