Yes, that could work but it is not necessary. Using a tx'ed non-cached
entity with batched id's will work better I think. The only drawback is if you
really really want all numbers in the sequence to be used (which will not be
guaranteed as any id's left in the current batch will be lost on server
stop).
/Rickard
|
- Re: [jBoss-User] Re: [jBoss-User... Tom Cook
- Re: [jBoss-User] Re: [jBoss-User... Tom Cook
- Re: [jBoss-User] Re: [jBoss-User... Rickard Oberg
- RE: [jBoss-User] Re: [jBoss-User] Tom Cook
- Re: [jBoss-User] Re: [jBoss-User] Rickard Oberg
- RE: [jBoss-User] Re: [jBoss-User] Tom Cook
- Re: [jBoss-User] Re: [jBoss-User] Kyle Cordes
- Re: [jBoss-User] Re: [jBoss-User] Rickard Oberg
- Re: [jBoss-User] Re: [jBoss-User] Bjarne Olsen
- RE: [jBoss-User] Re: [jBoss-User] VASQUEZ_JASON
- RE: [jBoss-User] Re: [jBoss-User] Rickard Oberg
- RE: [jBoss-User] Re: [jBoss-User] Tom Cook
- RE: [jBoss-User] Re: [jBoss-User] Jay Walters
- RE: [jBoss-User] Re: [jBoss-User] ERIK . POUPAERT
- Re: [jBoss-User] Re: [jBoss-User] Rickard �berg
- [jBoss-User] A newbie thing... Torsten Terp
- Re: [jBoss-User] A newbie thing... Rickard �berg
- [jBoss-User] Unique transaction number Krishna Kumar
- Re: [jBoss-User] Unique transaction ... Toby Allsopp
- RE: [jBoss-User] Re: [jBoss-User] marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-User] Re: [jBoss-User] ERIK . POUPAERT
