Hey
marc fleury wrote:
> |marc fleury wrote:
> |> |> |Will the planned use of RMI-IIOP in JBoss prevent us from using
> |> |> |RMI-JRMP?
> |> |>
> |> |> NO, it is just an alternative "invocation layer" yet to be done btw
> |> |
> |> |Speaking of alternative invocation layers, it would be a great
> |"whiz-bang"
> |> |feature if JBoss came with ZOAP already installed and working.
> |Even better
> |> |would be if it would generate "how to use me" pages like the
> |Microsoft SOAP
> |> |implementation, so users could download JBoss, point their
> |browser at it,
> |> |and twiddle with EJBs via SOAP.
> |>
> |> kyle, what you propose is an extension of JMX that mad andy is
> |doing??? if
> |> so please take a crack at it... could be cool
> |
> |Hey, that'd be cool. In fact, it's so cool that I've already made it.
> |The EJBench plugin for EJX is used to bring up a graphical view of EJB's
> |that you can invoke and such.
>
> with SOAP? (but yes the fact that it is available with RMI (?) is really
> cool)
No, the ordinary thing. But it's not tied to any particular protocol, it
just looks up the home from JNDI and starts reflecting on it.
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.jboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
