marc fleury writes:
> Ok,
>
> following Paul's note the other day, it seems to me that we should seriously
> think about offering Enhydra as an alternative front end to jboss.
>
> You know our feelings on J2EE and being JSP/servlet/EJB compliant. However
> it seems that Lutris is really onto something with XMLC and their framework
> and that people already use it in production. As long as it is an option
> that people can use with jboss, more power to everyone.
>
> I assume most people with Enhydra are taking the JOnAS route by default, but
> it seems Lutris' stuff is too good to be left to a bunch of french men :))
> (although it seems alexandre is out there :).
>
> So is there interest out there, just say the word, MBean integration is
> always an option and optimized integration should be a bit more work but
> something we could tackle over the coming weeks.
>
> what do you guys say "yay-nay-maybay"
We use XMLC lots instead of JSPs (means you can get your web designer
to do all the HTML however and make it look funky and they don't need
to know anything other than HTML). But we precompile our html using
XMLC and deploy just the compiled classes, and don't use XMLC at
runtime.
Tom
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
