> Just a quick follow-up. A permission is required to call > Subject.getSubject; in my opinion, the EJB container should not > grant that to the executing user code by default (unportable and > potentially insecure). You are of course correct. And yes, jBoss does not grant that permission if the EJB security is turned on. /Rickard -- -------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [jBoss-User] problem with ctx.getCallerPrincipal() Oleg Nitz
- Re: [jBoss-User] problem with ctx.getCallerPrinci... Tom Cook
- Re[2]: [jBoss-User] problem with ctx.getCalle... Oleg Nitz
- Re[2]: [jBoss-User] problem with ctx.getC... Tom Cook
- Re: [jBoss-User] problem with ctx.getCall... Darius Davidavicius
- Re: [jBoss-User] problem with ctx.getCallerPrincipal() Keith L. Musser
- Re[2]: [jBoss-User] problem with ctx.getCallerPri... Oleg Nitz
- Re: Re[2]: [jBoss-User] problem with ctx.getC... Rickard Oberg
- Re: Re[2]: [jBoss-User] problem with ctx.... Dan OConnor
- Re: Re[2]: [jBoss-User] problem with ctx.... Dan OConnor
- Re[4]: [jBoss-User] problem with ctx.... Rickard Oberg
- Re[4]: [jBoss-User] problem with ctx.getC... Oleg Nitz
- Re: [jBoss-User] problem with ctx.getCallerPrincipal() Keith L. Musser
- Re: [jBoss-User] problem with ctx.getCallerPrinci... Dan OConnor
- RE: [jBoss-User] problem with ctx.getCallerPr... marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-User] problem with ctx.getCallerPrincipal() Keith L. Musser
- Re: [jBoss-User] problem with ctx.getCallerPrincipal() Keith L. Musser
- Re: [jBoss-User] problem with ctx.getCallerPrinci... Dan OConnor
- Re: [jBoss-User] problem with ctx.getCallerPr... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-User] problem with ctx.getCall... Dan OConnor
