|marc fleury wrote:
|> what really surprises me is that the PrimaryKey hash is today "foolproof"
|> unless we are missing something. I believe it is something else, however
|> what I find strange is that the proxy that we returns the PK. Can we see
|> your PK, are you *SURE* they are exactly the same, that is the
|only reason I
|> can find for a cache miss.
|
|Yeah, my first guess would also be to check the primary key class equals
|and hashCode implementation.
the new implementation is based completely on the MarshalledObject so that
is foolproof and independent of the equals and hashCode. Hence my question
on the return values of the BMP methods.
|
|> I need to work on the website, Rickard are you on top of this? any other
|> ideas????
|
|I'm on top if I get more info to work with. Lorenz, can you post the
|primary key source code?
I saw the post on transactions... if that is the problem I don't have enough
information to say "tada" at once. More information is good lorenz... with
xml files and all
marc
|
|/Rickard
|
|--
|Rickard �berg
|
|Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|http://www.telkel.com
|http://www.jboss.org
|http://www.dreambean.com
|
|
|--
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
