Hey Robert Krueger wrote: > now that's really ugly ;-). Are the spec authors really aware of that? I > mean that does kind of violate sun's own official coding conventions. > looking at the spec your implementation is absolutely correct but somebody > must have missed that. What do you think? Will you contact anyone about > this? EJB spec authors are hereby notified. :-) Good idea. /Rickard -- Rickard �berg Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.telkel.com http://www.jboss.org http://www.dreambean.com -- -------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [jBoss-Dev] EJB 2.0 Home method support added Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home method support added Tim White
- Re: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home method support ad... Rickard �berg
- EJBDoclet v0.6 Re: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Hom... Rickard �berg
- [jBoss-User] What's the realistic production releas... Gritsenko
- Re: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home method support added Robert Krueger
- Re: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home method support ad... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home method suppor... Robert Krueger
- Re: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home method su... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home meth... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home ... Robert Krueger
- Re: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home method support added Lennart Petersson
- Re: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home method support ad... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home method suppor... Dan OConnor
- Re: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home method su... Tim White
- RE: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home meth... marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home ... Tim White
