Hi! > you probably mean bean<->tx in one container. I.e. that for a given bean > and a given tx there is only one container. > > but "all tx in one container" isn't realistic No, I really mean one tx in one container. If not, then there will be severe performance penalties on finders. And I mean *truly bad*. Why is not one container per tx realistic? /Rickard -- -------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home method support added Dan OConnor
- Re: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home method support ad... Tim White
- RE: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home method suppor... marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home method support ad... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home method suppor... Dan OConnor
- RE: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home method s... marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home meth... Dan OConnor
- RE: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home meth... marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home method support added marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home method support ad... Rickard Oberg
- RE: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home method suppor... marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home method s... Rickard Oberg
- RE: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home meth... marc fleury
- [jBoss-Dev] RE: [jBoss-User] EJB 2.0 Home method support add... marc fleury
