|
Of course, I had exaggerated to make the point. But to
sacrifice 30% of the height to ads is sad indeed. Ads will do well with
10%.
Viktor
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 12:25
PM
Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] FW: [jBoss-Dev]
FAQ quality
I
too have been "monitoring" the jboss site for the last six months or more,
since the original site we released. It has come a long way.
I think that Viktor is being a little to hard on the
jboss site. Has anyone looked at apache<retorical/>? Talk about "an icon
of ... Open Source movement". Apache is considered by most to be
just such a site. The apache site is _very_ basic and "ugly" relative to a
site such as Redhat. However, it is functional. IMHO, we should be more
concerned with the functionality of jboss(site) rather than it's look
and feel.
-john
Not everyone likes it, let's get the pictures right
at least....
also I will repeat that I will come up with a "biz"
look (this is the "dev" look and content) over the next few
days.
marc
Marc,
JBOSS is very important to me, almost an icon of Java
Open Source movement.
I waas montoring the website for last 2 months at
least.
Now, I have checked a new look and feel of jboss website
today.
I have experienced literally a phisical pain when mowing
my eyeballs while useing the site.
Seriously,
how can jboss logo occupy 30% of height of the
page,
how can the architecture of jboss picture be sow low
resolution.
Man, I am shocked. I really want to believe it will be
fixed very soon.
Viktor
|
