Jetty has a super-fast implementation to serve any
kind of page - static, dynamic (CGI, Servlet, JSP,
WebApp). Furthermore, because no arbitrary distinction
between different content types has to be made, and
because the http server and servlet container are so
tightly integrated Jetty can be extremely efficient.

Just my penniesworth,

Jules


--- Bill Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
If your plan is to just use your servlet container
> to serve up http, why not use tomcat without apache.
>  The benefit of running apache is that it serves
> static pages fast (I'm sure there are others).  If
> everything is going to come out of the servlet
> container, however, just set tomcat to listen on
> port 80.
> 
> Unless jetty has some super fast http implementation
> to serve up static pages, I think your loking at 6
> of one and half a dozen of the other. 
> 
> Bill Pfeiffer
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Michael G. Drew 
>   To: jBoss 
>   Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 4:26 PM
>   Subject: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat
> 
> 
>   I would like to design my web apps so that I can
> access them directy through a normal http url.  ie: 
> www.myserver.com/myapp   NOT: 
> www.myserver.com:8080/myapp.   I know I can do this
> by getting tomcat and apache working together, but
> when I introduce jBoss in the mix, I haven't been
> able to get the AJP12 communication working that is
> necessary for apache to work with tomcat.  
>    
>   The way I see it there are two options:
>    
>            Use jBoss/tomcat/apache:    must figure
> out AJP12 stuff
>                                                     
>  might be a bit slower (according to list)
>    
>           Use jBoss/Jetty:   since Jetty is both a
> Servlet container and Http server, I believe by
> integrating it into jBoss, I'll be able to have all
> three components (servlet, http, ejb) all working
> together AND be inVM.  I'm assuming this should be
> much faster than the jBoss/tomcat/apache approach.  
> I'm also assuming that I might be able to get my
> url's working again with this approach.
>    
>   Could someone please comment on the
> advantages/disadvantages of these two approaches and
> let me know if I've missed the mark on anything. 
> Many thanks as usual!
>    
>             
>   Michael G. Drew
>   Kishwaukee College
>   Interface Programmer
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   (815) 825-2086 ext 595
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Get organized for the holidays!
http://calendar.yahoo.com/


--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to