Rickard �berg wrote:

> If you guys have any other pet peeves that you want me to fix in EJX
> while I'm at it, let me know.

Hmm.  The way that JAWS works, it looks to standardjaws.xml for
everything not provided in a custom jaws.xml.  Will there be a way to
invoke the default for items while editing the JAWS-stuff?

i.e. not provide specific information on field type-mappings or include
DB type mappings?

Just a thought,

Thanks,

Tim


--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to