Rickard �berg wrote:
> If you guys have any other pet peeves that you want me to fix in EJX
> while I'm at it, let me know.
Hmm. The way that JAWS works, it looks to standardjaws.xml for
everything not provided in a custom jaws.xml. Will there be a way to
invoke the default for items while editing the JAWS-stuff?
i.e. not provide specific information on field type-mappings or include
DB type mappings?
Just a thought,
Thanks,
Tim
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]