Before posting more "official" numbers you my want to consider also
running the benchmark tests with IBM's JDK1.3. Many users are reporting
significant performance gains of Sun's JDK. Hopefully the same will be
true for jBoss.
Scot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 11/28/00, 3:02:04 PM, "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
regarding RE: [jBoss-User] jBoss Performance - Benchmark:
> |We run at 1ms - 6ms (**with** network and DB) on average in our
benchmarks.
> |With optimized stacks (from servlet to EJB) we run at 0.1-0.2ms ON
AVERAGE
> |(done on linux, w2k, solaris). Please show us what you measure exactly
I
> |don't know what is taking 199.9 ms :)))
> Ok I know what is going on. This is not "optimized" and you are going
> through the network serialization, while Orion doesn't. The
serialization
> is what is taking 199.9ms :)
> do you use the J2EE deployer? do you return 300bytes per invocation from
> your enterprise java beans
> marc
> |
> |Are you measuring from the servlet engine on down in which case you are
> |measuring the servlet and network...
> |
> |Also please explain your "time to first byte" because it includes the
> |servlet compilation? the throughput we measure on various beans is
between
> |1000/sec and 200/sec (10000req / sec optimized) ****for the EJB
> |container****.
> |
> |Maybe it is time to include the Orion servlet engine :)
> |
> |marc
> |
> |
> |
> |
> ||Avg. TTFB in ms
> ||
> ||
> ||The HTML Page was very small, only 163 Bytes, no Images or further
> ||references.
> ||The 660.47 Req/sec with Orionserver may be too small, my Client
> ||shows over 90% CPU during the test.
> ||
> ||The Servlet does an database query over the Network on a
> ||postgresql database, resulting page is 365 Bytes.
> ||I do an open database, query, close database in doGet, so driver
> ||performance counts.
> ||
> ||The EJB Test is constructed by an servlet, a session bean and
> ||entity beans with CMP on the same database and same table as used
> ||for the servlet test.
> ||The resulting page from servlet and EJB test is identical (365 Bytes).
> ||
> ||
> ||Stefan Roeper
> ||
> ||SoftWork EDV GmbH
> ||Robert-Bosch-Str.12, 30989 Gehrden
> ||Tel: 05108 / 6402 -11 Fax: -29 Mobil: 0177 / 277 48 71
> ||http://www.softwork-edv.de
> ||mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ||
> ||
> ||-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
> ||Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ||[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Julian Gosnell
> ||Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. November 2000 11:16
> ||An: jBoss
> ||Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ||Betreff: Re: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat
> ||
> ||
> ||Jetty has a super-fast implementation to serve any
> ||kind of page - static, dynamic (CGI, Servlet, JSP,
> ||WebApp). Furthermore, because no arbitrary distinction
> ||between different content types has to be made, and
> ||because the http server and servlet container are so
> ||tightly integrated Jetty can be extremely efficient.
> ||
> ||Just my penniesworth,
> ||
> ||Jules
> ||
> ||
> ||--- Bill Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
> ||If your plan is to just use your servlet container
> ||> to serve up http, why not use tomcat without apache.
> ||> The benefit of running apache is that it serves
> ||> static pages fast (I'm sure there are others). If
> ||> everything is going to come out of the servlet
> ||> container, however, just set tomcat to listen on
> ||> port 80.
> ||>
> ||> Unless jetty has some super fast http implementation
> ||> to serve up static pages, I think your loking at 6
> ||> of one and half a dozen of the other.
> ||>
> ||> Bill Pfeiffer
> ||>
> ||> ----- Original Message -----
> ||> From: Michael G. Drew
> ||> To: jBoss
> ||> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 4:26 PM
> ||> Subject: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat
> ||>
> ||>
> ||> I would like to design my web apps so that I can
> ||> access them directy through a normal http url. ie:
> ||> www.myserver.com/myapp NOT:
> ||> www.myserver.com:8080/myapp. I know I can do this
> ||> by getting tomcat and apache working together, but
> ||> when I introduce jBoss in the mix, I haven't been
> ||> able to get the AJP12 communication working that is
> ||> necessary for apache to work with tomcat.
> ||>
> ||> The way I see it there are two options:
> ||>
> ||> Use jBoss/tomcat/apache: must figure
> ||> out AJP12 stuff
> ||>
> ||> might be a bit slower (according to list)
> ||>
> ||> Use jBoss/Jetty: since Jetty is both a
> ||> Servlet container and Http server, I believe by
> ||> integrating it into jBoss, I'll be able to have all
> ||> three components (servlet, http, ejb) all working
> ||> together AND be inVM. I'm assuming this should be
> ||> much faster than the jBoss/tomcat/apache approach.
> ||> I'm also assuming that I might be able to get my
> ||> url's working again with this approach.
> ||>
> ||> Could someone please comment on the
> ||> advantages/disadvantages of these two approaches and
> ||> let me know if I've missed the mark on anything.
> ||> Many thanks as usual!
> ||>
> ||>
> ||> Michael G. Drew
> ||> Kishwaukee College
> ||> Interface Programmer
> ||> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ||> (815) 825-2086 ext 595
> ||>
> ||>
> ||
> ||
> ||__________________________________________________
> ||Do You Yahoo!?
> ||Yahoo! Calendar - Get organized for the holidays!
> ||http://calendar.yahoo.com/
> ||
> ||
> ||--
> ||--------------------------------------------------------------
> ||To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ||To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ||Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ||Nn�n������N�rz�z~��vr�z����
> |
> |
> |
> |--
> |--------------------------------------------------------------
> |To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |
> |
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
