good idea, even useful in the future
marc
|-----Original Message-----
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan OConnor
|Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 8:21 PM
|To: jBoss Developer; jBoss
|Subject: [jBoss-User] Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update
|
|
|Hi,
|
|We have taken up an awful lot of bandwidth on both the jboss developer and
|user lists discussing these licensing issues. I would like to propose that
|general "philosophy" discussions be moved to a different list, and that
|specific questions by a contributor to or a distributor of jboss
|be sent to the
|board at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|Of course, I recognize that this suggestion may be met with criticism. The
|jboss-dev and jboss-user mailing lists are unmoderated, and if anyone
|disagrees with me they may--of course--continue to post license
|discussions to these lists. There is no need to flame me; please
|just ignore
|me. :-)
|
|However, I have taken the liberty of starting an open-subscription egroups
|mailing list, called jbosslicense. You can subscribe at jbosslicense-
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] I suspect that announcements of license
|changes and the like would continue to be made on jboss-dev and jboss-
|user.
|
|Those who feel that the "broader jboss community" needs to be warned
|about the implications of the jboss license can probably rest assured that
|the issue has gotten a good airing, and that interested participants will
|move over to jbosslicense with them.
|
|This is not meant to demean the importance of this licensing discussion.
|People who intend to distribute jboss naturally will have a keen interest,
|and probably appreciate the comments from all points of view. This
|is just a
|suggestion that seems to me to make sense, considering the continuing
|high volume of traffic related to this discussion.
|
|-Dan O'Connor
|
|
|
|On 5 Nov 00, at 12:53, Peter Donald wrote:
|
|> At 07:16 4/11/00 -0600, you wrote:
|> >
|> >> At 06:46 4/11/00 -0600, you wrote:
|> >>
|> >> Rickard has already pointed it out. Do you think
|> >> he is a liar ? or wrong ? If so then say so but
|> >> why should I put in extra effort just because you
|> >> don't want to read Rickards post ?
|> >
|> >Jeezus H. Christ on a popsicle stick, Peter. Courtesy.
|> >Common freaking courtesy. My original note explained that I
|> >was having difficulty finding the quoted clause in this
|> >thread.
|>
|> Well that may have been the case but I have to take the defensive here.
|> When I originally posted my concerns I was told I was a liar, had no clue
|> about GPL or was just flaming for sake of it. When I answered questions
|> from certain individuals they just used that as an excuse to flame me,
|> apache or spread lies about apache. Now this only occured from a minority
|> so now I aint going to try to answer their questions because they do not
|> want the answers they want an excuse to flame. I am sorry I lumped you in
|> that group as I assumed you were just one of them. No offense
|intended and
|> sorry for not responding properly first time ;)
|>
|> Cheers,
|>
|> Pete
|>
|> *------------------------------------------------------*
|> | "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want |
|> | to test a man's character, give him power." |
|> | -Abraham Lincoln |
|> *------------------------------------------------------*
|>
|
|
|
|
|--
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|
