Hi!
Aaron Mulder wrote:
> As it was originally explained to me, this was implemented as
> described but it is an "extension" - the spec doesn't allow it. However,
> I haven't tried it myself any time recently. Rickard, are you sure it
> doesn't work that way? If so, then we can just drop that from the manual.
I am very sure it doesn't work that way, since it would be too
counter-spec. (and yes, I have checked the source)
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
