At 17:42 1.12.2000 -0800, you wrote:
>|Is there something wrong with 'Supports'?
>
>Hey, is it just me but I thought "supports" wasn't a valid tag for entities
>since you need to work in CMT with transaction by definition? Can one of the
>bible freaks set me straight?
For 'Supports' in CMT demarcation the container should handle the call as a
'NotSupported' case if the client calls without a tx context. The section
11.6.3 describes the handling of methods that run with "an unspecified
transaction context". I couldn't find where the spec says that 'Supports'
is invalid tag for CMT. There is a warning though that points out the
transaction semantics differ depending on the context, so 'Supports' should
be used with caution.
> If so isnt' this in the deployer verifier?
Nope. There are a couple of more things the verifier could do with
transactions though... I need to reread this chapter.
-- Juha
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
