After getting jBoss to work with an inVM Tomcat connected to Apache, I began to question whether having Apache in the equation is really that valuable. Even though the jBoss+Tomcat pair can dynamically deploy applications, Apache won't know about the new context and therefore will not be able to forward requests to Tomcat. Plus, it looks like Catalina will be fast enough for serving static files that Apache may not even be needed for a lot of sites. Comments? -- Dewayne -- -------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Help?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: [jBoss-User] Apache+Tomcat+jBoss -- is it necessary? Dewayne McNair
- RE: [jBoss-User] Apache+Tomcat+jBoss -- is it neces... Marty Farrell
- RE: [jBoss-User] Apache+Tomcat+jBoss -- is it neces... JJAR
- RE: [jBoss-User] Apache+Tomcat+jBoss -- is it n... Marty Farrell
- Re: [jBoss-User] Apache+Tomcat+jBoss -- is ... Lennart Petersson
- RE: [jBoss-User] Apache+Tomcat+jBoss -- is ... JJAR
- RE: [jBoss-User] Apache+Tomcat+jBoss -- is it neces... TODD.KEGLEY
- RE: [jBoss-User] Apache+Tomcat+jBoss -- is it neces... TODD.KEGLEY
- RE: [jBoss-User] Apache+Tomcat+jBoss -- is it neces... Thomas.Kirsch
- RE: [jBoss-User] Apache+Tomcat+jBoss -- is it neces... Russell_Pridemore
- RE: [jBoss-User] Apache+Tomcat+jBoss -- is it neces... Russell_Pridemore
