> But to be a legal IIOP remote interface all your methods in the remote > interface must declare java.rmi.RemoteException in their throws clause. So > check the methods in the Category interface and add the missing throws to > all methods there. This requirement is not just for IIOP compliance, > it's a requirement for all EJB remote interfaces. So you should have > received a whole bunch of other warnings as well. Yeah, I did get a whole bunch of those too. So I guess I tried to solve the wrong problem first :) Thanks for all the help with this everybody! ---Steve -- -------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Help?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [jBoss-User] Re: Legal RMI Types and ejbCreate Steve Stearns
- RE: [jBoss-User] Re: Legal RMI Types and ejbCreate Nortje, Andrew
- Re: [jBoss-User] Re: Legal RMI Types and ejbCreat... Steve Stearns
- Re: [jBoss-User] Re: Legal RMI Types and ejbC... Chad LaJoie
- Re: [jBoss-User] Re: Legal RMI Types and ... Steve Stearns
- Re: [jBoss-User] Re: Legal RMI Types... Juha-P Lindfors
- RE: [jBoss-User] Re: Legal RMI T... Steve Stearns
- RE: [jBoss-User] Re: Legal RMI Types and ejbCreate Nortje, Andrew
- Re: [jBoss-User] Re: Legal RMI Types and ejbCreat... Steve Stearns
- Re: [jBoss-User] Re: Legal RMI Types and ejbC... Scott M Stark
- Re: [jBoss-User] Re: Legal RMI Types and ejbC... Scot Bellamy
- Re: [jBoss-User] Re: Legal RMI Types and ... Steve Stearns
- RE: [jBoss-User] Re: Legal RMI Types and ejbCreate Nortje, Andrew
