On 26 Jan, Toby Allsopp wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> this is great news, and I have already checked the code. Fantastic!
> 
> Well, one does one's best :-)
> 
>> What I mean by a provider RI was exactly that, namely an implementation
>> of the provider part to use in testing the stuff. You already have that
>> from the sun RI, so no need to do that.
> 
> I'm still confused - I don't know what you mean by "provider". Are you
> referring to what the spec refers to as a resource adapter or connector,
> i.e. the bit that implements javax.resource.spi.*?

Sorry, I am still to much drained in JMS lingo: the resource adapter I
do mean.

//Peter
> 
>> I will probably start a test round howto make a provider implementation
>> for xmlBlaster, and I also think I will want one for JMS (although I
>> think it is a little unclear how to do this - OK, I made the Message
>> Driven Bean implementation for JBoss, so concurrency for subscribe is
>> already there - but with a publisher you actually would want to pool not
>> the connection but the sessions, I think...)
> 
> I don't know much about JMS, and I don't even know what "xmlBlaster" is,
> so I can't really comment on this.
> 
> The more resource adapters we have to test with, the better.
> 
> Toby.
> 
>> 
>> Again, great work!
>> 
>> //Peter
>> 
>> On 26 Jan, Toby Allsopp wrote:
>> > Hello.
>> >
>> > Alexander Kogan wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Peter Antman wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > I have asked about a J2EE Connector before here on the list (6 month
>> >> > ago), and I might be able to give a hand (not two) in this.Perhaps by
>> >> > writing a RI provider implementation (I personally need one for SpyderMQ
>> >> >  - or what was its new name - and xmlBlaster).
>> >>
>> >> There are some J2EE Connector stuff in CVS, look at
>> >> src/main/org/jboss/resource. I think it's MBean wrapper
>> >> for Sun RI (am I mistaken?). It's on by default in jboss.jcml.
>> >
>> > I'm not really sure what is meant by "RI provider implementation" or
>> > "MBean wrapper for Sun RI", but the stuff in org.jboss.resource is a
>> > first cut at a JCA implementation. It has nothing to do with Sun's RI.
>> >
>> >> I didn't try to use it yet, but I definitely will in
>> >> near future (a month?).
>> >>
>> >> Anyway, we should better ask Toby Allsopp ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>> >> about the current status.
>> >
>> > It currently works alright for Sun's example resource adapter that just
>> > wraps a JDBC XADataSource. There is some documentation at
>> > http://www.jboss/org/documentation/jca_config.html.
>> >
>> > This is going to change a bit shortly because the app server neutral
>> > parts will be implemented as part of Minerva. The details of this are
>> > not yet worked out, however.
>> >
>> > Toby.
> 
> 
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> List Help?:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Jobba hos oss: http://www.tim.se/weblab
------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Antman             Technology in Media, Box 34105 100 26 Stockholm
Systems Architect        WWW: http://www.tim.se
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  WWW: http://www.backsource.org
Phone: +46-(0)8-506 381 11 Mobile: 070-675 3942 
------------------------------------------------------------



--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Help?:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to