Yes, indeed there is an error in the documentation stating you have to define but it should be .
Anyway I did it correctly in my configuration file, but thx for pointing it out, it sure doesn't harm to publish this here. <jbpm-context> | <service name="persistence"> | <factory> | <bean class="org.jbpm.persistence.db.DbPersistenceServiceFactory"> | <field name="isTransactionEnabled"><false /></field> | </bean> | </factory> | </service> | ... | </jbpm-context> My problem is actually a bug as far as I can tell. Anyway if you're not using jbpm transactions and using commandExecutorThread you should have the same issue (no?). It just wanted to point this out and see if I am correct, even if it does not affect me at this moment (we are not using commandExecutorThread yet...) Olivier. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3965748#3965748 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3965748 _______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
