"kasim" wrote : "msystems" wrote : Use @PersistenceContext if you are using 
EJB3 and if you need a new transaction 
(@TransactionAttribute(TransactionAttributeType.REQUIRES_NEW) ) - Seam ref:
  |   | 
  |   | anonymous wrote : 
  |   |   | If you are using EJB3 and mark your class or method 
@TransactionAttribute(REQUIRES_NEW) then the trans- 
  |   |   | action and persistence context shouldn't be propagated to method 
calls on this object. However as the Seam- 
  |   |   | managed persistence context is propagated to any component within 
the conversation, it will be propagated to 
  |   |   | methods marked REQUIRES_NEW. Therefore, if you mark a method 
REQUIRES_NEW then you should access the en- 
  |   |   | tity manager using @PersistenceContext. 
  |   |   | 
  |   | 
  |   | otherwise use SMPC.
  |   | 
  | 
  | What you are saying at the top part is true.
  | 
  | However i don't believe the doco is saying use SMPC all the time.
  | 
  | Take a look at the first paragraph of the section. It basically refers to 
if you are using the component outside of a Java EE5 environment or if you have 
many loosly coupled components. Which as long as they are all SB the 
PersisetnceCOntext should transfer. However the doco is 100% right if you are 
going to have a mix of SB and POJOS .... then yeah doing the EntityManager 
injection is the only way to go.
  | 
  | So you can stick with the @PersistenceContext in most situations. Its going 
to be a situation where you are wanting to transact against non-EJB components 
you will want to use the @IN EntityManger. 
  | 
  | Of course that being said i am not sure the harm it would cause using the 
@In EntityManager more often.

Of course you don't have to use SMPC if you don't want to use it !
But there is an advantage in using SMPC if you have a lot of conversations with 
loosly coupled components.

98% of the time I'm using a SMPC and the last 2% of the time I'm using a 
persistence context (@PersistenceContext) - of course together with 
Seam-managed transactions.



View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4127541#4127541

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4127541
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to