I guess you could call it a persistence service of sorts, although the persistence is done outside of the JBPM realm.
Yes, I do lose a bunch of functionality such as timers etc.. Those types of things would need to be built into my own application if I needed them. The standard jBPM persistence model worked great for me as a proof-of-concept....I just had problems when I tried to ramp up the throughput, and that is what forced me to use this model. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4146361#4146361 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4146361 _______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
