Thanks for you comment, Tom. I am basically going the route you suggest. I do a simple conversion and see what else I need to take into account.
Luckily we are using BPM in a very light weight way - basically we use it as state machine and message pipe only. We do not use any Vitria rights management and only one business object. Everthing else happens outside of Vitria. I am currently working on a proof of concept. I plan to - replace the corba/messaging mechanism used for client/server communication with WebService. Currently 'events' which are actually method calls are sent over the message channel. - On the server side I use a BPM management object to process the 'events' and mimic what Vitria currently does. That way I do not need to change the interface to Vitria that is currently used. Hopefully, once the transition is done we can start using BPM the way it is intended ;-). THX, Bernhard View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3971444#3971444 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3971444 _______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
