Hello,
I'd like to use Seam to help JSR-168 portlets to communicate between each
others (e.g. portlet1.jsp, portlet2.jsp). My first very naive approach (using
Statefull Session Beans) didn't seem to work. Maybe it didn't work because
somebody (JSF,Seam?) sees the two portlets as two different "clients", so
different SFSBs are created for two different portlets.
Portlet1.jsp uses action1 (SFSB) to get a list of organizations, action2 is
different SFSB.
action1.java
| @DataModel
| List organizations;
|
portlet1.jsp
| <h:dataTable value="#{organizations}" var="org">
| <h:commandLink value="#{org.name}" action="#{action2.getEventsForOrg}">
| <f:param name="organizationId" value="#{org.organizationId}" />
| </h:commandLink>
action2.java
| @RequestParameter("organizationId")
| private String organizationId;
|
| @DataModel(value = "orgEvents")
| List orgEvents;
|
portlet2.jsp
| <h:dataTable value="#{orgEvents}" var="event">
| <h:column>
| <f:facet name="header">
| <h:outputText value="Type" />
| </f:facet>
| <h:outputText value="#{event.type}" />
| </h:column>
| </h:dataTable>
|
pages.xml
| <pages>
| <page view-id="/portlet2.jsp" action="#{action2.getEventsForOrg}" />
| </pages>
|
However, it seems that two different instances of action2 are created, one for
the portlet1.jsp (action="#{action2.getEventsForOrg}" and other one for
portlet2.jsp accesses. It doesn't matter if i use the pages.xml above or call
action2 inside the portlet2.jsp.
Is this Seam abuse ;) or misconfiguration?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3973105#3973105
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3973105
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
