"[email protected]" wrote : getChild() takes the fqn of the child,
it's a relative method. Root already provides the first /, so the name of the
child is without that first /: content/timestamp
|
| If u used Cache rather than Node, you'd do the following using the absolute
path:
| cache.getNode("/content/timestamp");
Thanks Galder. That makes sense but I'm having trouble reconciling your
comments with this code right out of the JBoss Cache Users' Guide:
| // Let's get a hold of the root node.
| Node rootNode = cache.getRoot();
|
| // Remember, JBoss Cache stores data in a tree structure.
| // All nodes in the tree structure are identified by Fqn objects.
| Fqn peterGriffinFqn = Fqn.fromString("/griffin/peter");
|
| // Create a new Node
| Node peterGriffin = rootNode.addChild(peterGriffinFqn);
|
This code uses an absolute value FQN to retrieve a node directly from the root
node (not from cache). Perhaps the Users' Guide is incorrect?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4239789#4239789
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4239789
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
