Alessio, thank you for your explanation. These exactly are the things which 
seem strange to me.

"palin" wrote : I think you can create that xml string the way you prefer, it 
doesn't matter how you do it as long as what you get is in compliance with the 
schema you provided in you wsdl; for example, we create it on the fly using 
jdom.
But wouldn't it be natural to suggest that since the message structure is 
written in the wsdl, the application sending the notification can use the 
generated stuff like the endpoint interface, user types etc? This would ensure 
that the resulting message is compliant to the wsdl. Is JSR-109 client support 
available for WS-Eventing?

"palin" wrote : The notification endpoint has to be able to process a soap 
message containing an xml in compliance with the data type schema defined in 
the wsdl, nothing more
Again, I would expect that I could write the notification endpoint 
implementation with the convenience provided by JSR-181 or JSR-109 support. 
Just a java class with annotation pointing to the event source wsdl, as in the 
JSR-181 POJO example. Is that possible?

Thanks,
Artem

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3977821#3977821

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3977821
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to