User development,

A new message was posted in the thread "Ability to configure jBPM in 
persistence.xml":

http://community.jboss.org/message/521154#521154

Author  : Ronald van Kuijk
Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kukeltje

Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Marcin,
 
I currently is not possible out of the box to have jBPM work with JPA. It be 
done by e.g. changing to using e.g. annotations or a persistence.xml file, but 
that is probably not all. So unfortunately for the moment it is hibernate (or 
you have to spend some time on it yourself, we are interested you know ;-)
 
Btw, is there a specific reason to not wanting to have two config files? Most 
likely jBPM will have it's own persistence.xml file don't you think so, maybe 
even it's own datasource so it is replacing one file for another. Or do you 
want to ditch hibernate complete in favour op TopLink, OracleLink EclipseLink 
or some other framework :-)
 
Regarding your second question (next time post it in a new topic please, easer 
to find then for others based on the subject.
 
jBPM does not deploy processdefinitions on it's own. Yes it is done trough the 
jBPM api but that has to be triggered somewhere (e.g. Seam) so find the source 
of what is triggering the deployment and fix it there.

--------------------------------------------------------------

To reply to this message visit the message page: 
http://community.jboss.org/message/521154#521154


_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to