User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Modules with null ClassLoaders":
http://community.jboss.org/message/524382#524382 Author : Kabir Khan Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- > mailto:[email protected] wrote: > > > mailto:[email protected] wrote: > > I'll try skipping the registration of such modules to see if any test > > breaks. Does anybody has a better idea on how to fix this? > That didn't break of the tests. Thinking again, it makes a lot of sense to > skip the registration of such modules. Given that the newly created class > pool will be mapped to a null class loader, it is useless. We are just > generating overhead that way. > Now I wonder which scenarios registerBootstrapLoaders is really needed for. That was probably just me fumbling in the dark :-) If some of them are not null, the purpose is probably to register those. Or are all of them null? I'm not familiar enough with the classloading/Module stuff to really know why the modules would have null classloaders -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/524382#524382
_______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
