Alejandro Guizar [http://community.jboss.org/people/alex.guizar%40jboss.com] replied to the discussion
"Is the simple fork/join with async execution paths broken in jBPM 4.0" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/547948#547948 -------------------------------------------------------------- > Can anyone please explain +why+ one needs to put async continuations on each > activity within a fork in order for things to advance automatically? Good question. I've filed https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBPM-2888 JBPM-2888 to investigate this problem. I'm guessing it is related to https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBPM-2787 JBPM-2787: process instances getting stuck in a fork, for jBPM3. There, setting the async attribute +in the join node+ is part of the solution. What strikes me as odd reading the comments in this thread is that every activity following the fork needs to be made asynchronous in jBPM4. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/547948#547948] Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2034]
_______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
