Carlo de Wolf [http://community.jboss.org/people/wolfc] created the discussion
"Re: EJB3 Session Bean Pool" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/597769#597769 -------------------------------------------------------------- For the benefit of other people new to this thread, you can only use ThreadlocalPool if the threads are backed by a pool. Spawning new / infinite threads will lead to new / infinite instances. ( http://community.jboss.org/message/589434#589434 http://community.jboss.org/message/589434#589434) The StrictMaxPool is designed to hold a maximum amount of instances. It does not care about concurrency or retention. I think it should be possible to extend StrictMaxPool and set the strictMaxSize semaphore higher than the maxSize. e.g. strictMaxSize = 200, maxSize = 50. That should allow for 200 concurrent requests, while the pool will size down to 50 during low load. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/597769#597769] Start a new discussion in EJB3 at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2029]
_______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
