pushpak1981 [https://community.jboss.org/people/pushpak1981] created the 
discussion

"jBPM5.2 KnowledgeBase Behaviour"

To view the discussion, visit: https://community.jboss.org/message/724027#724027

--------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,

We have configured jBPM5.2 with Spring3. In our project we are trying to start 
multiple processes using a single session. We are using spring threadingpool to 
execute multiple process into the same session.

Our requirement is that we want the current active processes into the session. 
We can get it from session.getProcessInstanceMethod(). \

This call is working fine when we directly lookup for ksession for springs 
cotainer.

StatefulKnowledgeSession b = (StatefulKnowledgeSession) 
ctx.getBean("ksession"); 
System.out.println(b.getProcessInstances().size() + "---" + b.getId());  /// 
Print 2 as 2 processes are running in spring thread pool


But when we try to get the same process list using the KnowledgeBase we get 
list size as 0.

KnowledgeBase b = (KnowledgeBase) ctx.getBean("kbase");
System.out.println(b.getStatefulKnowledgeSessions().size());   /// Retruns 1 as 
we have one session configured in Spring application context xml
 
for (StatefulKnowledgeSession s : b.getStatefulKnowledgeSessions()) {
        System.out.println(s.getProcessInstances().size() + "---" + 
s.getId());   //Returns Size as 0. even if 2 processes are running and are into 
wait state.
    }
 


Are we doing anything wrong in case of KnowledgeBase API ? How we can get the 
Active process list from the KnowlegdeBase API ? 

Thanks.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to this message by going to Community
[https://community.jboss.org/message/724027#724027]

Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community
[https://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2034]

_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to