This is not a bug, it's normal and appropriate canonicalization of XML. With the exception of dropping the charset attributes, all of these items are legitimate XML transformations which should not affect the behavior of any compliant XML parser. The two example fragments you describe are completely equivalent (again, other than the missing attribute).
p View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3983738#3983738 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3983738 _______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
