"genman" wrote : 880: I know you and Manik don't believe me, but this is a 
fundamental feature that most cache services provide as part of their basic 
API, i.e. put(k, v, ttl).
  | 
  | The dev discussion explains this motivation in detail. I already gave about 
3 examples (HTTP cache, session cache, geospatial cache), are these not 
compelling examples?
  | 

Why can't they be implemented using regions.

Elias, I'm not really against this, but I'm against adding API (or parameters 
to existing methods) for things that can be achieved in a different way. 
Manik: if we can do this using the Options parameter, then I'm fine with Elias' 
proposal, otherwise still a -1 from me.

anonymous wrote : 
  | 841: I don't see how you can implement efficient queries (that is better 
than O(N)) without some sort of indexing, or in this case per-node sorting.
  | 

Okay, fine as long as we do *not* need to add the 2 proposed methods to the 
Node interface, but to the OrderedNode *class*. So I assume this requires 
another enum to let the Node factory know which type of node to create ? 
However, if you want to use an OrderedNode, you'd have to narrow Node to 
OrderedNode.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3990754#3990754

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3990754
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to