Hi! I wonder about the style used in this forum when it comes to posts where user complain about the interoperability between Seam and Tomahawk.
In the past we (I) tried some stuff in Tomahawk-sandbox which might have had some influence with Seam, but this has been fixed (as far as I know). Tomahawk itself do nothing strange with e.g. the Lifecycle, at least as far as I am aware. A sandbox is always a dangerous thing. Maybe there are better looking/working JSF component libraries out there , but still, there is no reason to be this negative against Tomahawk and _force_ people to NOT use it. So, instead of ranting around here, it would be great if you (the JBoss Seam Team) could give us a hint if something went wrong so that we can fix it, or, at least, document the incompatibilities so that users do not have to spent eons of time to figure out themself. Maybe we should sign a contract with Jboss about the effort to make our techniques better compatible. Just as everyone do with M$ these days. Thanks! Ciao, Mario View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993794#3993794 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993794 _______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
