batter wrote : Also noticed that my receive rate is higher than my send rate, 
impressive :-) 

Please make sure that you're not in a local singularity area, where the 
time-space continuum is distorted. 

:)

The story behind the framework is that we wanted to introduce a new kind of 
tests, the performance test, so it can be automated and systematically run 
before each major release, and so help us to keep a documented track of how key 
performance metrics evolved over time and warn us if we majorly screwed up, or 
allow us to pat ourselves on the back otherwise. 

The framework is infrastructure for that (you may have noticed that is intended 
to save data series in a database). 

Unfortunately (or better said, unfortunately for the time being), the amount of 
raw functionality to be implemented in the main code base exceeds our resource 
pool, so the whole performance measuring and monitoring thing has (and I must 
stress, temporarily) fallen down the priorty list. 

Once we're feature complete after 1.2, we plan to return to the performance 
framework and make it more solid. If you're interested in this area, and have 
ideas on how to improve things, please feel free to contribute them, they are 
appreciated. Better yet, code them ...



View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3998440#3998440

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3998440
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to