I've used the separate ports approach (e.g., the binding file) successfully in 
the past but stopped because I would frequently encounter problems which 
required me to make changes to the port configurations.

For developers at least, using the IP address binding approach is generally 
simpler.  If you have multiple IP addresses on your machine, you can simply 
bind each server instance to one of your IP addresses when you start the server 
(e.g., run.bat -c server1 -b 192.168.1.101)

If you have a laptop with a wired connection and a wireless connection, you can 
use their IP addresses as the two IP addresses for a two node network.  If you 
only have a single connection, you should be able to follow your OS's 
instructions for enabling a loopback address to be used as the second IP 
address.  Presumably you can configure a three node network on your machine 
using wired/wireless/loopback but I haven't tried this.

If you need to use the binding file and it always fails on port 8080, try 
debugging the problem by modifying the use of port 8080 to another port in the 
file.  If the problem manifests itself on the new port, then you know that the 
override entries in the file aren't correct.  This could be because you didn't 
specify the correct node name or it could be because the file overrides 
themselves are wrong.    If the problem still shows up on port 8080, then look 
for uses of port 8080 in your server's service files and try changing them 
there.  This would indicate that either you haven't configured the override 
file process correctly or else the use of port 8080 has been changed and the 
format in the bindings file is no longer adequate to provide the override.

I've had far fewer problems since I started using the IP address approach.  The 
one caveat there is that you need to be aware of IP address changes if your 
machine has dynamic addresses.  In my case at least, this is rarely a problem.

Hope this helps.

Jerry  

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4003400#4003400

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4003400
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to