I'd agree. IName is not a good naming strategy. Name adornment should indicate some addition or specialization of a class. IName violates this intuitive notion by adding adornment to the most basic/simplest form of the class - the interface.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4006552#4006552 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4006552 _______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
