Hello, I have done it without using the jboss cache. I use only a "signal", that is a parameter in the underlying HttpServletRequest. I wonder if it is a proper way. (clean, surely not, but working ok ?).
If anyone can confirm it is ok ? if so, I'll write a wiki about this, with the helper class and test portlets I made for this feature. In the process action of the portlet that want to invalidate the cache of all portlet, I set a render parameter. resp.setRenderParameter(CACHE_SIGNAL_RENDER_PARAM_NAME, | CACHE_SIGNAL_RENDER_PARAM_VALUE); | In the ConsumerCacheInterceptor : - I get the invocation.getContext() and try to cast this context to an AbstractInvocationContext - if this cast is ok, I get the HttpServletRequest client request from it HttpServletRequest httpServletRequest = abstractInvCtxt.getClientRequest(); | - from this HttpServletRequest, I get the parameter httpServletRequest.getParameter(CACHE_SIGNAL_RENDER_PARAM_NAME); If the value of the parameter says to invalidate the cache, I do so. The parameter is seen in the ConsumerCacheInterceptor for all the windows/portlet of the page... which is great for this feature, but seems strange. The parameter was set for only one portlet, in its processAction method... I have made some detailed tests, and it works fine. anybody can confirm this is ok ? Julien ? Thanks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4025241#4025241 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4025241 _______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
