Hi Claudia,

I've been looking at your example, and it raises some interesting issues.

First of all, I think that using two different transports on the same port is 
just asking for trouble, since each transport has its own expectations about 
what messages are coming in.  So, unless you have a really good reason for 
using the same port, I would recommend against it.

I expected that when I changed your code to use different ports for the socket 
and multiplex transports, everything would work fine.  It didn't, so I thank 
you for using two transports on the same port (even though you shouldn't!), 
since it pointed out a couple of things to be fixed.  What is happening, as I 
think you know, is that the JNDIDetector heartbeat is finding an old reference 
to a server that no longer exists, trying to ping it, and inadvertently 
connecting a socket (respectively, multiplex) client invoker to a multiplex 
(respectively, socket) server invoker.  The socket server invoker sees some 
bytes it doesn't expect, but it shrugs them off.  The multiplex server invoker 
is a little more brittle, so I've made a couple of changes to make it more 
robust. (Jira issue JBREM-729).

I still found that the example wasn't working quite as I expected, and I made a 
couple of changes to JNDIDetector as well (Jira issue JBREM-730). In 
particular, JNDIDetector was slow in discovering its new environment because it 
was counting to 5 before doing a clean detect.  I changed it so that it does a 
clean detect on the first heartbeat.  Also, it had trouble registering its new 
information with the JNDI server because it was using Context.bind() instead of 
Context.rebind().

These changes are committed to the CVS repository and will be part of the next 
release.

Claudia, I'm curious if you're using Remoting in production code, or are you 
experimenting?

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4031925#4031925

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4031925
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to