In my endpoint implementation I have a user-defined exception thrown by some 
operations. The generated wsdl then looks something like:

...
  | <xs:complexType name='AuthorizationException'>
  |     <xs:sequence>
  |           <xs:element minOccurs='0' name='message' type='xs:string'/>
  |     </xs:sequence>
  | </xs:complexType>
  | ...
  |  <operation name='read'>
  | ...            
  |     <fault name='AuthorizationException'>
  |         <soap:fault name='AuthorizationException' use='literal'/>
  |     </fault>
  | </operation>
  | ...

>From this wsdl wsconsume generates the following client-side artifacts:
AuthorizationException (jaxb type)
AuthorizationException_Exception (java exception)

In the client I then I then get some awkward code like

try {...} 
  | catch (AuthorizationException_Exception ex) {...}

To get around these problems I defined a custom jax-ws binding, which is then 
provided to wsconsume:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
  | <bindings
  |     xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
  |     xmlns:jaxb="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxb";
  |     xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/";
  |     wsdlLocation="http://localhost:8080/static/test.wsdl";
  |     xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxws";>
  |     <bindings node="wsdl:definitions">
  |         <package name="com.test"/>
  |     </bindings>
  |     <bindings node="wsdl:definitions/wsdl:types/xsd:[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]'http://com.test']">
  |         <jaxb:schemaBindings>
  |             <jaxb:package name="com.test.jaxb"/>
  |         </jaxb:schemaBindings>
  |     </bindings>
  | </bindings>

basically this puts jaxws and jaxb generated artifacts into separate packages.

However, this works only if I remove the 'package' attribute from the wsconsume 
task. From this I conclude that the 'package' attribute takes precedence over 
any custom bindings. Why is this so?

Is there any other way to get nice exception class names with wsconsume?

Regards,
Magnus

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4033007#4033007

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4033007
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to