Hi,

Should the same technique be used to layer xhtml resources like EJB's can be (using the @Install annotation)? If so, how would you have multiple pages.xml files - and would it conflict?

Say I had a real view: "/product/function.xhtml" and I had customised version of it deployed at a particular site called "/site/product/function.xhtml". Could (or rather should) I use this approach:

<page view-id="/product/function.xhtml">
        <navigation>
                <render view-id="/site/product/function.xhtml"/>
        </navigation>
</page>


And refer to the view generally as only "/product/function.xhtml", but actually load "/site/product/function.xhtml". Or should I use something like EL at all times and resolve the actual resource via a method call or resource bundle?

What methodology have you used to address this in the past?

Cheers,

David



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

pages.xml for a fake view id is like:

<page view-id="/entryPoint.xhtml">
 |     <action execute="#{something.doSomething}"/>
 |     <navigation>
 |         <render view-id="/displayWelcome.xhtml"/>
 |     </navigation>
 | </page>

or something close to that.

There is no /entryPoint.xhtml file. thats just the URL you want to appear in 
the browser.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4057064#4057064

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4057064
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

-----------------
Utiba Pty Ltd This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by Utiba mail server and is believed to be clean.


_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to