Does this mean that there is not as yet a solution to my problem? Or does it mean I should tackle my problem differently in the mean time? If so, would you be able to kindly provide an example of how you would tackle based on the following scenario:
At the product layer we have say, a page that allows you to update a customers details. The outcomes are "update", "delete" and "view history". A particular client wants to redefine the process and page flow slightly: They want to; add a new outcome to the page "add note", remove an outcome "view history" and modify the process/page flow for the delete outcome to capture a deletion reason (so, an interim page in the flow for that other process). Essentually: Change: /user_info.seam | -> update | -> delete | -> confirm (/delete_user_confirm.seam) | -> view history (/view_user_history.seam) To: /user_info.seam | -> update | -> delete | -> delete reason (/site/delete_user_reason.seam) | -> confirm (/delete_user_confirm.seam) | -> add note (/site/add_user_note.seam) It's a fairly stupid example, and would probably be tackled differently/better in a real layout - But, the example demonstrates all layers that I need to be able to override. Cheers, David View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4059488#4059488 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4059488 _______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
