| public class ZeroOneType extends CharBooleanType {
|
| protected final String getTrueString() {
| return "1";
| }
| protected final String getFalseString() {
| return "0";
| }
| public String getName() { return "zero_one"; }
|
| }
|
Yep, I'm currently trying out something like the above with a
@Type(type=foo.ZeroOneType) annotation. Lets see how it works out.
I've come to the conclusion with all converters etc that my domain objects have
some traces of legacy-db-reverse-engineering. I'm now working towards making
them more natural (booleans are booleans, enums are enums)...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4070751#4070751
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4070751
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
