My understanding is different.
For instance once the author of a document completed with draft it might ask 
somebody to review the document. And the process of reviewing would be a normal 
business process. As the result of reviewing the document could be promoted to 
the next state. But, when it is being promoted the action assigned to the 
transition could perform whatever we want, for instance inform the people 
interested in the traking the document about the the fact that the document has 
been promoted. That's why I believe jBPM suites.

Lifecyle is similar to state-diagram or timeline (It's matter of taste). I'd 
prefer not to see tasks in the Lifecycle graph.
And what is important user can be happy looking at the picture. Tasks make the 
picture overcomplicated.



View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4072239#4072239

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4072239
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to